[ ´_ゝ`]原本我中午是不回宿舍睡觉的，因为我要卷数学，老二和老三老六也是如此，所以只有老大和老五会在宿舍里午睡。
但是昨天格外地热，我吃完饭后在教室里感受着黏糊糊的皮肤，挣扎了许久，还是决定回宿舍冲个凉会比较舒服一点。
当时已经一点二十多了，我为了不打扰老大和老五休息，便蹑手蹑脚地走到宿舍门口，用以前去爸妈房间偷摸手机的技术无声无息地开门
然！后！！
我看到
老五在给老大嗦牛子[|||ﾟДﾟ]
我身边的空气似乎凝固了下来，可他们那边的空气却是春意盎然，老大闭着眼按着老五的头，老五跪在地上前后摆动，两人都没发现我[´ﾟДﾟ`]
我思索了一番，刚准备退出去假装什么都没看到，没想到老大突然睁眼，就看到我了[ ・_ゝ・]
可能是被我吓到了吧，他突然就爆射了出来，射了老五满满一嘴，米青液滴滴答答地流出来，让老五看起来格外地像个烧鸡。
但是昨天格外地热，我吃完饭后在教室里感受着黏糊糊的皮肤，挣扎了许久，还是决定回宿舍冲个凉会比较舒服一点。
当时已经一点二十多了，我为了不打扰老大和老五休息，便蹑手蹑脚地走到宿舍门口，用以前去爸妈房间偷摸手机的技术无声无息地开门
然！后！！
我看到
老五在给老大嗦牛子[|||ﾟДﾟ]
我身边的空气似乎凝固了下来，可他们那边的空气却是春意盎然，老大闭着眼按着老五的头，老五跪在地上前后摆动，两人都没发现我[´ﾟДﾟ`]
我思索了一番，刚准备退出去假装什么都没看到，没想到老大突然睁眼，就看到我了[ ・_ゝ・]
可能是被我吓到了吧，他突然就爆射了出来，射了老五满满一嘴，米青液滴滴答答地流出来，让老五看起来格外地像个烧鸡。
#723837
>>Po.723733
原文Sexuality in China: A review and new findings发表在Chinse Journal of Sociology的“Sex Life in China”的专刊上
原文Sexuality in China: A review and new findings发表在Chinse Journal of Sociology的“Sex Life in China”的专刊上
#723847
痛
#723855
>>Po.723841
emmmm看了原文之后我发现有问题，5%和22%这两个数据是上一节为性支付费用里面的，实际上因性获利的人占比竟然更大[ ﾟ∀。]
The prevalence of receiving material benefits for sex was higher than paying for sex among men. Except for men born in 1995–2002, we generally observe a negative relationship between educational level and receiving material benefits for sex. Men of lower SES were more likely to receive money or gifts for having sex; in particular, more than half of those born between 1990 and 1994 with less than a high school education had exchanged sex for material benefits. However, as only 9 male respondents of this cohort have not completed high school education, such a high rate is subject to a large sampling error. Influenced by gender stereotypes, Chinese women are often perceived as being more frequently involved with receiving material benefits for sex (Ding and Ho, 2013; Tucker and Ren, 2008). However, our results show that the proportion of women receiving material benefits for sex was much lower than that of men, only about one-third. For women born before 1970 and in the 1970s, 9.3% of those with graduate education had ever exchanged sex for material benefits, higher than women with lower educational levels. Yet for women born in the 1980s and early 1990s, a higher proportion of those with a lower education had received material benefits for sex.
在男性中，为性获得物质利益的比例高于为性付出的比例。除了 1995-2002 年出生的男性外，我们普遍观察到受教育程度与获得性物质利益之间存在负相关关系。社会经济地位较低的男性更有可能因发生性关系而获得金钱或礼物；特别是，在 1990 年至 1994 年出生且未受过高中教育的人中，有一半以上以性换取物质利益。然而，由于该队列中只有 9 名男性受访者未完成高中教育，如此高的比率受制于较大的抽样误差。受性别刻板印象的影响，中国女性通常被认为更频繁地参与获得性的物质利益（Ding 和 Ho，2013；Tucker 和 Ren，2008）。然而，我们的研究结果表明，女性在性方面获得物质利益的比例远低于男性，仅为三分之一左右。在1970年以前和1970年代出生的女性中，9.3%的受过研究生教育的女性曾经以性换取物质利益，高于文化程度较低的女性。然而，对于 1980 年代和 1990 年代初出生的女性来说，更高比例的受教育程度较低的女性在性方面获得了物质利益。
“仅为三分之一”，“远低于男性”，我不好说了[ ﾟ∀。]
emmmm看了原文之后我发现有问题，5%和22%这两个数据是上一节为性支付费用里面的，实际上因性获利的人占比竟然更大[ ﾟ∀。]
The prevalence of receiving material benefits for sex was higher than paying for sex among men. Except for men born in 1995–2002, we generally observe a negative relationship between educational level and receiving material benefits for sex. Men of lower SES were more likely to receive money or gifts for having sex; in particular, more than half of those born between 1990 and 1994 with less than a high school education had exchanged sex for material benefits. However, as only 9 male respondents of this cohort have not completed high school education, such a high rate is subject to a large sampling error. Influenced by gender stereotypes, Chinese women are often perceived as being more frequently involved with receiving material benefits for sex (Ding and Ho, 2013; Tucker and Ren, 2008). However, our results show that the proportion of women receiving material benefits for sex was much lower than that of men, only about one-third. For women born before 1970 and in the 1970s, 9.3% of those with graduate education had ever exchanged sex for material benefits, higher than women with lower educational levels. Yet for women born in the 1980s and early 1990s, a higher proportion of those with a lower education had received material benefits for sex.
在男性中，为性获得物质利益的比例高于为性付出的比例。除了 1995-2002 年出生的男性外，我们普遍观察到受教育程度与获得性物质利益之间存在负相关关系。社会经济地位较低的男性更有可能因发生性关系而获得金钱或礼物；特别是，在 1990 年至 1994 年出生且未受过高中教育的人中，有一半以上以性换取物质利益。然而，由于该队列中只有 9 名男性受访者未完成高中教育，如此高的比率受制于较大的抽样误差。受性别刻板印象的影响，中国女性通常被认为更频繁地参与获得性的物质利益（Ding 和 Ho，2013；Tucker 和 Ren，2008）。然而，我们的研究结果表明，女性在性方面获得物质利益的比例远低于男性，仅为三分之一左右。在1970年以前和1970年代出生的女性中，9.3%的受过研究生教育的女性曾经以性换取物质利益，高于文化程度较低的女性。然而，对于 1980 年代和 1990 年代初出生的女性来说，更高比例的受教育程度较低的女性在性方面获得了物质利益。
“仅为三分之一”，“远低于男性”，我不好说了[ ﾟ∀。]
#723856
>>Po.723855
Table 10.Proportion of receiving material benefits for sex among Chinese men and women by birth cohort and educational level.
Table 10.Proportion of receiving material benefits for sex among Chinese men and women by birth cohort and educational level.
#723894
等等怎么一转学术了[ﾟДﾟ≡ﾟДﾟ]
#723906
>>Po.723856
谢谢博哥[=ﾟωﾟ]=
谢谢博哥[=ﾟωﾟ]=
#723945
不过不得不说社科做调查真难啊|∀ﾟ
7000份有用数据结果抽样误差还是很大|∀ﾟ
之前看一个帖子吐槽，说误差要是想搞小点，问卷量得10万起步。
7000份有用数据结果抽样误差还是很大|∀ﾟ
之前看一个帖子吐槽，说误差要是想搞小点，问卷量得10万起步。
#726403
po是不是被???了
#746204
痛
#746415
失
#746425
>>Po.717621
等。。等等，女朋友未成年？(ﾟДﾟ≡ﾟдﾟ)!?
等。。等等，女朋友未成年？(ﾟДﾟ≡ﾟдﾟ)!?
#746594
等，等等，po不会还是高中生吧[´ﾟДﾟ`]
#747182
[ ˇωˇ]人 散了吧，痛失popo