什么时候开？

>>Po.862941
但……我觉得我的水平应该达不到你的期望[ ﾟ∀。]7

>>Po.863026
[ ﾟ∀。]我会放低期待。

>>Po.862820
是没问题，人家也没说有问题啊[ ﾟ∀。]

“小瞌睡虫，我想说，现在还没有到截止日期的节点，而我的精力是有限的，不可能把每一张卡都全部收录，那样会破坏我的节奏以及届时正式跑团时无法在卡上倾注足够的心力

我能说的是，你的卡有着足够通过的标准，但这份标准会随着其他人更好的卡的出现而变得暗淡并不突出

所以我的建议是，如果你真的很希望参团的话，在车卡截止前，可以尝试更多地丰富一下人物卡”

好经典的pua言语。

伊甸团感觉吐槽一出来大伙都想起po是哪位了吧[ ﾟ∀。]

>>Po.863180
[ ﾟ∀。]既视感太强了，或者说个人风格确实很明显

那也挺好的[〃∀〃]

暴论，有风格能被认出来也好过没风格千篇一律吧[ ﾟ∀。]

>>Po.863208
赞成[〃∀〃]

>>Po.863208
[ ﾟ∀。]这种风格未免太过分了。

>>Po.863208
[ ﾟ∀。]确实，比如毛绒桑top桑

>>Po.863232
但是像隔壁某个即时爽打踢门团那样的还是算了吧[ ﾟ∀。;]

>>Po.863231
若是两边都愿意我觉得挺好的[〃∀〃]毕竟开团嘛

>>Po.863208
[ ﾟ∀。]自带pua的不讨喜毒舌风格还是算了吧

>>Po.863309
啊？会这样想吗？

写多人团好累啊，激情开始消退[ ´_ゝ`]旦

Trust isn't an abstract quality or independent behavior. We didn't "have trust" and then we could play like this. We played this way, or developed doing it pretty soon, and then it's accurate to say we trusted one another. It's very misleading to imply that a group would have some weird metaphysical quality first in order to be able to do a thing. [I find similar misleading problems in discussions of love and self-esteem.]

Perhaps counter-intuitively, the presence of distrust is indeed a real thing, so if that's the case, then what I'm talking about is not possible. So instead of saying, "trust each other, then you can do X," the proper sequence would be, "play in the absence of distrust [i.e. without people in that state], do whatever it is you all like, and then we can talk about trust being present."

[ ﾟ∀。]我觉得这两段可以解决大部分GM和PL之间的“信任”的争议。

>>Po.863426
[ ﾟ∀。]首先我得会英文
所以UoG什么时候试着开个人少的多人团？1-3人那种

>>Po.863448
应该可以丢机翻，不过我网页端复制不了[ ﾟ∀。]